Esteban Manchado Velázquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oops, sorry, I shouldn't have uploaded the package in its current state.
It's all right, everyone makes their share of broken uploads. > Fixed in SVN. I will upload soon. Thanks! >> Incidentally, it would probably also be wise to give the doc-base files >> versioned names (say, by appending -1.8) so that you won't run into >> trouble if you add support for other Ruby versions down the road. > > OK. In fact, I'm not sure what's the best place to put the documentation. > I think I'm going to move the documentation to the dummy package and perhaps > create symbolic links in the rest. Anything against that? The problem with that is that the dummy package won't necessarily be installed -- unless you set up circular dependencies, but we're trying to cut down on those. Given that the documentation is still pretty small in an absolute sense, it should be okay to leave it as it is and just rename the doc-base files as I suggested. Alternatively, you could split it out into a new -common or -doc package, but the ftpmasters might consider that to be overkill. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
