On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 6:53:57 PM Scott Howard wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Scott Howard <showard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you, Chris. I think you articulated the situation well and the > > options. > > one more thing: debian is discussion dropping libdb (the db the node, > but not the wallet, uses). That might force our hand as well: either > ship and support upstream's included libdb or drop the node and just > ship the wallet. libdb long-term security maintenance might be > challenging.
You mean LevelDB? Debian should use the embedded copy regardless, due to the consensus-critical requirements. It is not possible to build BCCore wallets without the node at this time. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
