Gruesse!
* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am [24.11.05 20:48]:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
> Gerhard Brauer told:
>
> [...]
> > Hello,
> >
> > mutt-ng (and mutt) has a nice (patched?) feature to do a correct
> > List reply even the mailbox is not defined as "list" or subscribe
> > by looking at relevant header vars.
>
> Wrong! Lists have to be defined in lists or subscribe.
No, since some version (in Debian) of mutt, and later then muttng, there
is another (nice!) option which i mentioned. It works not on all
mailinglist but on those which have a relevant list-id header.
For this, and mutt(ng)'s nice handling of mailing-lists(replys), many other
users of other MUA grudge us.
Don't cut our features ;-)
> > This could be reproduced here. If i use mutt instead (which has
> > the similar feature) then it works, e.g. also if the mutt header
> > cache would be used.
>
> I can reproduce this as well. So maybe the bug should be that
> mutt-ng should _not_ have to do a list-reply on lists which are
> _not_ defined in lists or subscribe. This looks more logical, isn't
> it?
No Sir ;-) Here we have a feature, not a bug that we might to look as a
feature. And if the functionality is broken by other then i sound this a
bug.
But more seriously, i like and miss this feature cause i must not
additional edit a config file.
> > I dont't see any parameter which will correct this behavior (only
> > using maildir_header_cache_verify=yes correct the error, but with
> > this it's obsolet to use a header cache). header_cache_compress is
> > set to yes.
>
> As a workaround define your lists/subscibed.
That's clear. But i will try Roccos patch. Perhaps with his patch we
could fix the bug?
> Elimar
Greetings,
Gerhard
--
Try rm -rf (_R_ead _M_ail _R_ealy _F_ast)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
