Gruesse! * Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am [24.11.05 20:48]: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 the mental interface of > Gerhard Brauer told: > > [...] > > Hello, > > > > mutt-ng (and mutt) has a nice (patched?) feature to do a correct > > List reply even the mailbox is not defined as "list" or subscribe > > by looking at relevant header vars. > > Wrong! Lists have to be defined in lists or subscribe.
No, since some version (in Debian) of mutt, and later then muttng, there is another (nice!) option which i mentioned. It works not on all mailinglist but on those which have a relevant list-id header. For this, and mutt(ng)'s nice handling of mailing-lists(replys), many other users of other MUA grudge us. Don't cut our features ;-) > > This could be reproduced here. If i use mutt instead (which has > > the similar feature) then it works, e.g. also if the mutt header > > cache would be used. > > I can reproduce this as well. So maybe the bug should be that > mutt-ng should _not_ have to do a list-reply on lists which are > _not_ defined in lists or subscribe. This looks more logical, isn't > it? No Sir ;-) Here we have a feature, not a bug that we might to look as a feature. And if the functionality is broken by other then i sound this a bug. But more seriously, i like and miss this feature cause i must not additional edit a config file. > > I dont't see any parameter which will correct this behavior (only > > using maildir_header_cache_verify=yes correct the error, but with > > this it's obsolet to use a header cache). header_cache_compress is > > set to yes. > > As a workaround define your lists/subscibed. That's clear. But i will try Roccos patch. Perhaps with his patch we could fix the bug? > Elimar Greetings, Gerhard -- Try rm -rf (_R_ead _M_ail _R_ealy _F_ast) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]