Bill Allombert wrote: > Would that description be OK: > > httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server > > Are there other developper maintaining WSGI related packages to second > this ?
I second the above description. I (co-)maintain uwsgi, which is capable of serving HTTP (via Apache2 but also) on its own, and handle (a lot of protocols including) WSGI. On a related note, it probably makes sense to add similar note for PSGI and maybe other protocols too (not sure how widespread other ones are), but that's outside the scope of this bugreport, I guess. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
