On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 02:48:12PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > As I've said in #309554 I strongly believe /srv/ should be used for both. I > like to add now, that IMO - if /srv is a policy violation at the moment > (vorlon, what is your statement/guess regarding FHS 2.3 and etch ?)
FHS 2.3 for etch is still an open question, as there are some transition issues. But as far as I'm concerned, /srv is fine for packages to begin using. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
