On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 05:25:24PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > A Mennucc wrote: > > Suppose moreover that somebody sends a > > > > $ bts close #wrongbugnumber #version > > > > where #wrongbugnumber is a mistyping: then it > > would be useful to have a command > > > > $ bts unfixed #wrongbugnumber #version > > > > to correct the former. > > The way to do that is actually "bts found bug version".
No, that doesn't work: bts close 123456 1.3-2 bts found 123456 1.3-2 would mark bug#123456 (in some other package) as found in version 1.3-2, whereas it might have already been correctly marked as closed in version 1.2-7. > I think that the bts command should continue to provide a 1:1 mapping > with bug manipulation commands in the BTS. If you find the BTS's choices > of commands for these things could use improvement, I think you should > get it fixed there first. Sounds almost reasonable, but I do like the idea of bts providing a nice way to send a message to nnnnn-done. Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
