On 08/17/2014 10:55 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: > Regarding the patch: I'm not near a PC right now, so can't check: Are you > sure the license of those files with the exception had a "or later" on their > GPL option?
I'm pretty sure about that. The QT project licensing page links to the licenses as published by the FSF which contain the "or later" part. Furthermore the LICENSE.LGPL and LICENSE.GPL files contained in QT projects contain "or (at your option) any later version". > Regarding the commercial option: I wouldn't leave it out, as IMHO d/copyright > should be a exact representation on the license, even if a option is not > really applicable. I agree in general, but we're not able to document the text of the commercial license. The other QT software I looked at also don't specify the commercial license, have you found any that do and if so how do they handle this issue? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
