On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:51:31 +0400 Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote:
> > Ceph packages are present in wheezy-backports repository, so I don't > > understand why RBD support is systematicaly disabled as in changelog > > for version 2.1+dfsg-2~bpo70+2. Just a small clarification. This is the current situation with ceph in wheezy-backports: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ceph&suite=wheezy-backports For 28 days it can't be built on several architectures, and maintainer does not care, -- as I said, they work in "upload and forget" mode, never looking at bugs (including Fails To Build From Source (FTBFS) bugs like this one), their package stayed with RC (release-critical) bugs for months during wheezy release, and the situation hasn't changed since that time. This is the actual reason I had to _disable_ ceph support in my last bpo upload. > > Could you keep RBD support on future releases in wheezy-backports? Did you read the bpo changelog entry in qemu package? Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
