* Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org) [140902 21:39]: > On mar., 2014-09-02 at 20:42 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org) [140902 18:40]: > > > On mar., 2014-07-29 at 18:04 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote: > > > > I just tried to find this explaination at [1], but no luck. Do you > > > > mind providing > > > > me the link where you explained why this is low priority? > > > > > > On all other ppc64el bugs opened (usually by various ibm people but not > > > only). They don't even look tagged so it might be a bit hard to check. > > > > ppc64el is now an official architecture, and this bug is blocking a > > couple of other packages from being built. So a fix of this bug would > > be helpful now. > > > > If it helps I could upload this fix with an NMU. > > I already NACK'ed the patch touching the files directly, we need to make > a clean autoreconf. > > I've started to investigate but again, that's a bit lower priority than > the Jessie-related stuff.
So a patch with a "normal" dh-autoreconf would generally look acceptable for you? (Just asking to be sure it's worth spending time on it) Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
