Am 02.09.2014 um 23:06 schrieb Reto Buerki: > severity 758742 wishlist > > Hi, > > On 08/20/2014 09:46 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Please don't restrict the list of architectures; >> >> * Remove ia64, s390 from Architecture field >> >> If this is the only reason ... these architectures are gone. > > No the reason is that Anet has been initially written for Linux > amd64/i386. Other architectures/kernels were not a primary target. > > Since then, Anet has been successfully ported to BSD and other > architectures are working fine as well. > > But still, I'm conservative enabling new archs without rigorous testing. > Besides accessibility problems with some archs, this requires quite some > time (which I don't have atm). > > This is why I'm setting the severity of this bug to 'wishlist'.
no, you are not conservative, but you are hiding issues. knowing which tests fail is far better than just not building. >> fyi, build results on arm64 and ppc64el at >> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/anet/0.3.1-1ubuntu1 >> >> the udp tests fail on ppc64el. any idea why? see pastel.debian.org for the >> porter machine. > > This is exactly the reason why not all architectures are enabled. well, you (or your sponsors) have access to the porter boxes. please use these. Just disabling these architectures just *hides* the issues. >> the arm64 build is ok. > > I will enable this arch in the next upload, thanks! > > - reto > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
