On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:26:50PM +0800, Paul Harris wrote: > I would imagine this below: > > > > > if (0==c && 1==c) > > isn't a good idea, because it would break symmetry with custom > operator==() behaviour. Okay, I'm no CPP guy though :)
Is it a problem to warn in C, only? I know little about the design of gcc, but it seems that this would be useful and should be possible. Maybe limit the warning to arithmetic types only? -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
