Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> retitle 341241 RM: partimage-doc/sarge -- RoM; Useless without partimage
> itself
> tags 341241 sarge
> thanks
No reason for a removal, there are other packages that some people
consider useless as well, and we don't remove them either.
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 03:35:31PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > I took over the partimage/partimage-doc packages shortly before the
> > sarge release.
> > Unfortunately partimage had an RC bug and I couldn't get it ready for
> > the sarge release in time so it was removed from sarge. partimage-doc
> > wasn't affected by this RC bug and is now in the sarge archive.
> > Having partimage-doc but not partimage in the sarge archive doesn't make
> > much sense (please see also bug #315769).
> > As I presume that it is not possible to get partimage into the sarge
> > archive afterwards (if this is possible please let me know) I request
> > the removal of partimage-doc from sarge.
>
> Please contact the stable release manager (Joey Schulze, Cc'd) about
> this, so that he can schedule removal upon the next point release (if he
> agrees). I'm afraid addition indeed isn't possible anymore.
Removing a working package (partimage-doc) is not an option.
Adding a new package (partimage) is not an option either.
Regards,
Joey
--
Have you ever noticed that "General Public Licence" contains the word "Pub"?
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
