On 11/30/05, Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The iiimf-server bug looks more serious, though. > > Maybe reassign this bug to iiimf-server? The upshot is that it won't > install.
Eck, libiiimutils0 only existed in older iiimf packages in unstable... I thought nobody was using them, guess I was wrong ;) Expect a newer iiimf-server that Conflicts/Replaces libiiimutils0 soon. Thank you for reporting, Roger
