On mer., 2014-09-10 at 19:50 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:13:35PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > > Hi Salvatore, > > > > On Mittwoch, 10. September 2014, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > The tabular view clearly would need some improvement and making clear > > > where the fix is already, e.g. wheezy-security but not yet wheezy. I > > > try to explain. The version tracked on the individual CVE pages is > > > *correct* from the following point of view: A fix is in wheezy-security > > > already, but not yet accepted into the wheezy suite. > > > > thanks for explaining this here also, but as on IRC I wonder: > > > > for whom is that view useful? > > For noone, we already discussed that during the security team meeting > and we decided to fix the view as also described in your bug report. > > It's only that noone has come around to change this. But since you now > have experience with the code base... :-) > It's still important to have the data available because wheezy is what you get when you pick the latest install media. -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
