Control: affects 748668 wdm
Control: severity 748668 important
Hi Eliad,
Eliad Bagherzadegan wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 02:04 PM, Agustin Martin wrote:
> > I guess that if you remove slim wdm will work again.
>
> Thank you. I actually had to purge slim for wdm to work again.
> Sorry for the duplicate bug report and on the wrong package.
You don't need to be sorry. I, as wdm package maintainer, wasn't aware
of the issue which causes unexpected behaviour of my package and now I
am. I probably would have found out after testing, and since you
mentioned slim, I likely would have installed it at some point during
testing.
Thanks also to Agustin for the notice about the other report.
Closing #761236 report now. I'm not sure if #748668 should be marked
as "affects" for _all_ other display managers (or only those which
don't have a service file yet?).
I'll mark it at least as affecting wdm as there were already two users
who ran in to this issue. (I saw in #748668 that Agustin also had wdm
as default.)
And I'm raising the severity of #748668 to important for now. Not sure
if it should be even RC, depends if wdm counts as "unrelated". (The
description of the severity "critical" contains the phrase "makes
unrelated software on the system break". Then again, "critical" is
very likely a too severe rating.)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
