On Wed, September 10, 2014 09:01, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > Source: dutch > Version: please provide hunspell-nl > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > It's not at all evident that someone can mix hunspell & myspell > dictionaries packages. > > myspell-nl could maybe provide virtual package name hunspell-nl > > or maybe it is better to create a new hunspell-nl binary package. > > or you could also follow example of "myspell-sv-se" that is > a transitionnal package that depends on "hunspell-sv-se" .
We in general follow the policy set out by dictionaries-common, so the spell checker packages in Debian all behave consistently. I'm Cc'ing the dict-common-dev mailing list to find out how this is handled or should be handled in general. Then of course we'd be happy to implement this. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
