On 17.09.2014 04:15, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > I keep working on this. Hello and welcome back.
> So far, I was able to build 2.2.8 in Debian and this should fix all > the serious bugs with this packages. I did this simplifying the build > and replacing ant with javahelper. Another option is to keep using > ant since Markus did some work in a branch. Could you push your changes to Git please? > However, as I said previously 2.2.8 introduces a new dependency on > Java EE 6/7 APIs but I found out some issues with the APIs source > licensing. > > According to > http://central.maven.org/maven2/javax/javaee-api/7.0/javaee-api-7.0.pom > that code is dual licensed under GPLv2 and CDDL. > > However there are some .java files in the source with confidential > clauses and some weird non-free disclaimers. Maybe those disclaimers > are outdated, I have to confirm this and if everything is OK, then get > that package in the archive. I have written a new debian/copyright file and pushed it to experimental. Maybe you can use it as a starting point for the final release. I can confirm what you wrote. There is at least jsf-ri/systest-per-webapp/process-as-jspx/src/java/Blink.java which is non-free according to its license terms. I believe the other clauses are O.K. They are licensed under the GPL-2 with classpath exception or the CDDL and some files contain code fragments once licensed under Apache 2.0 > Another option is to check if some mojarra features depending on those > APIs can be disabled. > > I'll post again when I have more info. If you need some help, please feel free to ping me. Cheers, Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
