On 19/09/14 20:15, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > On 19/09/2014 19:43, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> On 2014-09-19 18:22, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >>> On 2014-09-19 18:03, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>>> Control: forwarded -1 >>>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/llvm-defaults-3.html >>>> On 16/09/2014 19:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>>> On 05/09/14 17:47, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>>> Ping? I'm mostly interested in whether the affected packages are in >>>>> the tracker, i.e. we don't have 200 packages to transition but less >>>>> than a handful. >>>> Sorry about the lag. >>>> That seems wrong to me. >>>> apt-rdepends -r libllvm3.4 >>>> suggests more packages like mesa, python-llvm, gambas, etc >>>> >>>> However, I am not a specialist of transition. So, it might be just >>>> me :) >>> >>> I think the problem is here: >>> >>> /lib(clang1-3.5|libllvm3.5)/ >>> >>> i.e. liblibllvm3.5 >>> >>> I'll play with the tracker and see what happens. >> >> Ok, this seems to come out with sensible results: >> >> is_good = .depends ~ /lib(clang1-3.5|llvm3.5)/ | .depends ~ >> /python-clang-3.5/; >> is_bad = .depends ~ /lib(clang1-3.4|llvm3.4)/ | .depends ~ >> /python-clang-3.4/; >> >> How does it look to you? >> > Much better, thanks :) > >> Some things left on that list is going to need a source upload to fix >> dependencies on -3.4 packages, plus llvm-dev switching default >> version, if you want 3.4 removing. >> > yep, business as usual :/
You initially said you wanted to keep 3.4 for jessie, no? So this is a matter of changing the defaults, and then getting a few packages rebuilt and some others updating their (build-)dependencies. Isn't that the case anymore? Can you explain the plan here in detail? Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org