On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 01:15:39PM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > 2014-09-23 10:28 GMT+03:00 Guido van Steen <vanst...@users.sourceforge.net>: > > I would like Mariadb to be accepted before the freeze as well. However > > I am not a DD, so I cannot sponsor it myself. > > Thanks for your feedback! > > > In order to get Mariadb sponsored you might handle at least the > > Lintian error > > (https://lintian.debian.org/tags/build-depends-on-obsolete-package.html, > > http://labs.seravo.fi/~otto/mariadb-repo/logs/mariadb-10.0/mariadb-10.0_10.0.13-1_amd64.build-d992d30.log). > > If it is a false positive, please explain why. > > You are talking about: > E: mariadb-10.0 source: missing-build-dependency dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~) > > Isn't this a bug in Lintian? The package dpkg-dev is part of > build-essential and there should not be any need to specify it. Why > does Lintian add the version number, what is special about 1.16.1~ ? > The package builds ok on sid, wheezy, trusty and precise, which most > have older dpkg-dev than those.
FWIW, Lintian's changelog for version 2.5.13 (30 May 2013) has this entry: * checks/rules: + [NT] Remove check for "dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~)" build-dependency, since this is trivially satisfied in Wheezy and Jessie. That is, the Lintian authors realized that the 1.16.1~ dependency is fine in unstable, testing, stable and oldstable, so there is no need for this check any longer. So it looks like Guido may have been using an older version of Lintian. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org p.penc...@storpool.com PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature