On 09/24/2014 11:57 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Yunqiang Su <wzss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Richard B. Kreckel <krec...@ginac.de> wrote:
>>> On 05/16/2014 10:20 AM, Yunqiang Su wrote:
>>>> Package: cln
>>>> Version: 1.3.3-1
>>>>
>>>> This patch fix cln build on mips64 and mips64el.
>>>
>>> Thanks very much for your patch!
>>>
>>> I've just one question: Why switch from __mips64__ to __mips64?
>>> I remember (a long time back, admittedly), that I had to switch the
>>> other way, from __mips64 to __mips64__ to make things work.
>>
>> Ohhh, both of them work now.
>> Keep __mips64__ should be OK.
> 
> Sorry for it.
> 
> There do be no __mips64__, so we should change it to __mips64.

Can you, please, prepare a patch, test if it works, and send it to me? I
won't hesitate applying it.

   -richard.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://in.terlu.de/~kreckel/>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to