Hello, alberto fuentes, le Sat 23 Aug 2014 15:15:24 +0200, a écrit : > would you kindly explain the downgrade of severity of the bug? > > I would not expect a migration of this kind without bumps, but it took > 3 years in 2002 to add this feature ( #150295 ) and this seems like a > regresion to me 10+ years later
I can only concur here, I have just been hit by it. This is a showstopper in quite a few cases. Sometimes I *do need* to get my system to boot timely to get some information or start a presentation, etc., not after the periodic fsck. That was the whole point of the allow_cancellation option in e2fsck, which now does not work any more. So this is not a wishlist, but a regression. It's actually breaking another package. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
