On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 21:25:07 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Andreas Barth (a...@ayous.org) [140928 14:32]: > > I also have an idea for an ugly hack but I need to think a bit more > > about it. From package POV it might be the "niciest", but I'm not sure > > if it works (which is a precondition for everything). I'll update this > > mail tonight. > > What works in practice, and seems to be ok-ish from a theoretical POV > is to create a symlink from libclang-3.5.so.1 to > /usr/lib/`dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_MULTIARCH`/libclang.so.1 > during build time (as part of the deb file). This allows doxygen to > work again. > That seems wrong. If wheezy's libclang1 and jessie's libclang1-3.5 aren't binary-compatible, the latter shouldn't provide a libclang.so.1. And if they are, then there shouldn't be two different package names. I fear we're just adding hacks on top of hacks here, somebody please clarify.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
