[message manually resent to BTS] On 2014-10-05 Teddy Hogeborn <te...@recompile.se> wrote: > Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> writes:
>> python-gnutls has now been fixed, with the attached trivial patch mandos >> builds successfully. >> * GnuTLS v3 transition. Update b-d to libgnutls28-dev, version >> python-gnutls dependency. Closes: #762349 > I am confused by your patch. Didn't you say that Jessie would not > contain libgnutls26? In that case, why change the Build-Depends from > libgnutls-dev to libgnutls28-dev? Mandos will work with either, and > when libgnutls26 is removed, libgnutls-dev will be libgnutls28-dev, and > everything will be fine. Hello, This not going to happen. libgnutls-dev will simply be removed. It will not be taken over by gnutls28. [...] > The change which the patch makes to the "Depends" line for the "mandos" > package baffles me even more; the "mandos" binary package does not > depend on any specific version of python-gnutls, it uses what's > available, and runs well with either. The latter change was on the paranoia side, it simply makes sure that both gnutls library dependency and python-gnutls are using the same GnuTLS backend. Not knowing mandos at all I went for the safest possible way. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
