Is it that so? Are all Atmel adjustments included in the 1.8.1? On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Simon John <g...@the-jedi.co.uk> wrote: > Hi folks, > > is there any update on this? Would it be possible to pull in the header? > > Why are we using the Atmel patches? Its going to be a long time before > we get avr-libc 1.8.1 that way. > > For a couple of years avr-libc upstream looked a bit dead so Atmel was > the only choice, but now I'd say upstream have overtaken Atmel again. > > Cheers. > > > On 23/09/14 07:19, Hakan Ardo wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> thanx for the report. I suppose we could pull in a single header file >> from avr-libc trunk if the general consensus is that the Atmel version >> is in a bad state. >> >> Aurelien, you been pushing for using the Atmel patches. Can you see >> any issues with this? Thanx. > > > > -- > Simon John > https://github.com/sej7278 > g...@the-jedi.co.uk
-- Håkan Ardö -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
