Excerpts from Thayne Harbaugh's message of 2014-10-14 16:39:04 -0700: > Package: mysql-server-5.5 > Version: 5.5.39-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, >
Hi Thayne. Thanks for taking the time to report a bug. It is much appreciated and your thoughts are valued. > The mysql-server-5.5 .deb lacks a systemd .service file. > > * What led up to the situation? > > Saltstack (salt-master .deb) is unable to manage mysql-server on > a system running systemd. A /lib/systemd/system/mysql.service > file will address this. > Salt is broken then. There are _thousands_ of perfectly good working sysvinit scripts. Ansible is quite capable of managing a hybrid system, perhaps copy their approach? > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > > Potentially the salt systemd module can be expanded to manage > services running in SysVinit compatibility mode. Some simple > tweaks of the salt module were insufficient. > > The /etc/init.d/mysql script is more sophisticated than most. It > does not lend itself to a simple .service implementation. > Agreed on all points. > * Additional information: > > There is a similar Fedora bug that has been addressed and closed: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714426 > > It appears this was addressed with a combination of a .service > file as well as some additional scripts. > I know that your intentions, and those of the Fedora developers above are well meaning. However, IMO this is mostly a waste of time. MySQL is an application, and isn't going to be part of early-boot plumbing any time soon. So having a systemd service is entirely for style points. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org