Bill Allombert wrote: > Indeed, but I am concerned that providing data for a small subset of > the archive is a increasing the risk a deanonymization. > > Currently unstable+testing is about 15% of the archive but it is > often much less. Furthermore if we publish data for unstable+testing, > then data for old-stable and older can be computed by substraction, > which is another subset that could be used for deanonymization. > > Add to that that processing an extra substet take quite a lot of time.
I'd personally be happy to get this data for the top 50% most installed packages or so. I guess that would avoid most of the data leaks? > > Also, there is no graph of the total number of reporters who are using > > a given release. "Statistics per popularity-contest releases" is almost > > that, but not really. > > What is missing, specifically ? Summing up the appropriate lines by eye is rather difficult.. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
