On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 08:38:32PM +0100, Ian Jackson
<ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> You mentioned that as a side rant. It wasn't relevant so this bug
> report so I ignored it.
It's sad that you consider valid bug reports rants, not relevant, and
ignore them, but it really doesn't matter. I will no longer waste time
with adns or you.
As for Debian, I would strongly suggest deprecating/removing adns, as
libraries that can't resolve www.microsoft.com, www.google.de etc.
_by design_ are hardly useful, and much time will be wasted by people
believing adns is actually useful for dns resolving.
Neither glibc nor ares nor udns suffer from these bugs, i.e. resolve all
of the cases in this ticket correctly as per RFC 1094.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schm...@schmorp.de
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
