On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:54:04 +0100 Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org> wrote: > But as you see, it's not actually useable and shows that warning.
It's definitely usable despite the warning (since it's not an error), although the experience is certainly far from ideal (ie, you have to then use "-t experimental" to actually get packages out of it since APT doesn't agree that the name should be "rc-buggy" instead). FWIW, it certainly seems strange to me that "unstable" would get the privilege of a proper codename but "experimental" is left out cold, which is what led me to search out this bug in the first place (seeing that "rc-buggy" is a thing on the mirrors, and indeed mirrors "experimental", but has this unfortunate quasi-status). :) ♥, - Tianon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
