Using 340.46-3 amd64 on sid, same behaviour, no improvements unfortunately.
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> wrote: > Andreas Beckmann dixit: > > >On 2014-10-15 06:27, Jonas Lippuner wrote: > >> Is there any news on this? Has the problem gone away with new packages > >> available in testing? > > > >Any results from 340.46 (jessie/sid) or 343.22 (experimental)? > > Sorry, I’m on x32 now (although with a :i386 X server due to #758094), > can’t test (due to gcc-4.8:i386 depending hard on binutils:i386, which > is not coïnstallable with binutils{,-multiarch}:x32 and not Provides > by the latter either). > > So I’m stuck with nouveau right now. > > bye, > //mirabilos > -- > [...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but > what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be- > ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, > there > was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :) -- Ted Unangst über > *fs > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org