Package: mbuffer
Version: 20140310-1
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: arm64

The latest version of mbuffer failed to build on arm64 with the
following error.

Invalid configuration `aarch64-linux-gnu': machine `aarch64' not recognized
configure: error: /bin/bash ./config.sub aarch64-linux-gnu failed

Version 20110119-2 built successfully.

Looking at the changelog I see "Use dh-autoreconf instead of
autotools-dev to also regenerate the configure script and friends"

It appears your package is one of the handful of cases that uses
autoconf and config,sub/guess but does not use automake. autoreconf only
updates config.sub/guess if automake is used so your package still needs
autotools-dev to update them despite using autoreconf.

Debdiff attatched.

If I get no response to this I will most likely NMU it after either the
current version migrates to testing or arm64 is formally declared a
release architecture (which will make this a rc bug and a testing
migration blocker)

diff -Nru mbuffer-20140310/debian/changelog mbuffer-20140310/debian/changelog
--- mbuffer-20140310/debian/changelog   2014-10-22 22:19:20.000000000 +0000
+++ mbuffer-20140310/debian/changelog   2014-10-25 10:45:20.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+mbuffer (20140310-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Use autotools-dev in addition to autoreconf because this package does not
+    use automake and autoreconf only updates config.sub/guess if automake is
+    used.
+
+ -- Peter Michael Green <plugw...@debian.org>  Sat, 25 Oct 2014 10:44:18 +0000
+
 mbuffer (20140310-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Fix the watch file: support both absolute and relative links.
diff -Nru mbuffer-20140310/debian/rules mbuffer-20140310/debian/rules
--- mbuffer-20140310/debian/rules       2014-10-22 21:38:37.000000000 +0000
+++ mbuffer-20140310/debian/rules       2014-10-25 10:41:33.000000000 +0000
@@ -9,4 +9,4 @@
 override_dh_auto_test:
 
 %:
-       dh $@ --with autoreconf
+       dh $@ --with autoreconf,autotools_dev

Reply via email to