On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 01:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I think this is the upstream change which would fix this. Please test > this on top of the previous one, in case there are any more cases where > ipv6_select_ident() may be called with a rt == NULL. > > However, it seems that with this change, when a VM offloads UDP/IPv6 > fragmentation to us, we will always set the fragmentation ID to 0. I'm > not sure whether that's a regression from 3.2.62, but I think it is. We > should not be choosing fragment IDs for VMs, but currently they aren't > telling us what to use! I've queried this upstream.
I've now written and tested patches for that remaining regression. Source at: https://people.debian.org/~benh/packages/linux_3.2.63-2+deb7u1.dsc https://people.debian.org/~benh/packages/linux_3.2.63-2+deb7u1.debian.tar.xz Binary at: https://people.debian.org/~benh/packages/linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64_3.2.63-2+deb7u1_amd64.deb There's a signed .changes file there as well, for verification (distribution=UNRELEASED in case you are wondering). Additional testing would be appreciated. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Theory and practice are closer in theory than in practice. - John Levine, moderator of comp.compilers
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
