On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 14:10 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 26/10/14 14:59, Brian Drummond wrote: > > "gdb nautilus" allows me to reproduce the segfault, but doesn't return > > control to the debugger. So the "pool" (is it a process? I can't see it > > in ps ax) containing the error must be elsewhere in the system. > > You might need to make sure all nautilus processes have been killed > before starting one under gdb - nautilus probably has some "single > instance" logic going on.
Update re: gvfsd-smb-browse gvfsd-network gvfs/gvfsd-dnssd I think I managed to get these running under gdb (they certainly produce debugging output when I do things in Nautilus). However the segfault doesn't appear (i.e. return control to gdb) under any of them. So far I haven't managed to capture "pstree -p" containing a "pool" with PID that later matches the PID in the segfault. If I could, at least I'd know what created it. - Brian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org