On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 14:10 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 26/10/14 14:59, Brian Drummond wrote:
> > "gdb nautilus" allows me to reproduce the segfault, but doesn't return
> > control to the debugger. So the "pool" (is it a process? I can't see it
> > in ps ax) containing the error must be elsewhere in the system.
> 
> You might need to make sure all nautilus processes have been killed
> before starting one under gdb - nautilus probably has some "single
> instance" logic going on.

Update re:
gvfsd-smb-browse
gvfsd-network
gvfs/gvfsd-dnssd
I think I managed to get these running under gdb (they certainly produce
debugging output when I do things in Nautilus). However the segfault
doesn't appear (i.e. return control to gdb) under any of them.

So far I haven't managed to capture "pstree -p" containing a "pool" with
PID that later matches the PID in the segfault. If I could, at least I'd
know what created it.

- Brian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to