[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Janusz S. Bien) schrieb: > On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:20:25 +0100 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank K�ster) writes: > > [...] > >> You could have done >> this yourself, by sending your answer to [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > Sorry, I didn't know.
No need to apologize. It didn't cause any inconvenience to me, it's just two customized keypresses away. I just wanted to tell you. >> Do you mean that the cjk-latex Debian package is broken? Then please >> file a bug against it, with an appropriate severity (if it's really >> unusable, I'd say grave). We do not want to release sarge with a broken >> package. > > My bug report #169286 is 2 years and 86 days old, Sorry, I missed it, because I had expected an "important" or "grave" bug if you said that it is broken. > although the problem > perhaps has been solved already. It seems so, since the version in sarge and sid contains a file called CJKulem.sty, and the bug is tagged woody. > The example quoted there fails now > now for a different reason, described in bug report #165350, > which is 2 years and 115 days old. It seems the cjk-latex maintainer isn't the most active one. If I find time, I'll have a look into this. Regards, Frank -- Frank K�ster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z�rich Debian Developer
