On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:01:04AM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote: > Hi Niels, > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 09:29:58PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > On 2014-10-28 09:36, Ricardo Mones wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: unblock > > > > > > Please unblock package claws-mail > > > > > > This is a bugfix release to complete removal of SSLv3 usage in > > > all protocols and broken appdata added in 3.11.0 mainly. > > > There's no Debian bugs reported yet (3.11.0 happened last week). > > > > > > Further details: > > > http://git.claws-mail.org/?p=claws.git;f=RELEASE_NOTES;hb=refs/tags/3.11.1 > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > unblock claws-mail/3.11.1-1 > > > > > > [...] > > > > Hi Ricardo, > > > > The changes seems to contain quite a bit of "noise". Would you be able > > to provide a filtered debdiff between the version in unstable and > > testing? This might give us a better idea of what we will be accepting. > > Previous unstable (3.11.0-1) would have naturally migrated to testing > this week if nothing done. And that's the version to be replaced by > current upload (3.11.1-1). > > Don't really understand why are you comparing with current testing > (3.10.1-4) which by default would never have been the candidate > version to be released as stable. > > This looks like I'm being "punished" with a bigger debdiff (minor > version change vs micro version change) just for acting fast to > avoid undesired changes in testing. Doesn't look fair :) > > Or do you really mean debdiff between 3.11.0-1 and 3.11.1-1?
10:31 < mones> nthykier: forgot to mention in the response that 3.10.1 in
testing is still not disabling SSLv3 (this was fixed in 3.11.0),
so even in the hypothetical case 3.11.0 would not have migrated,
you don't really want current testing in stable
Thanks,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Carl Sagan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
