Martin Mokrejs <mmokr...@fold.natur.cuni.cz> (2014-10-29): > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > So I've done that and Stanislaw replied[1] it would be nicer if the > > reporter could actually test the patch. Martin, any chance you could > > give it a shot to confirm? > > > > 1. http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141458072930743&w=2 > > > > It seems you already built a vanilla kernel but I could probably build > > a patched linux-image-3.16-3-amd64 package for you if needed. > > OK, please send me a URL where to fetch the modified Debian kernel package. > Or a series of shell commands? ;-)
https://people.debian.org/~kibi/linux/ has the patched linux package, along with its sha1sum, and a GPG signature, and the source diff against the linux package currently in testing. I did check that the relevant line was present in the resulting package: alias=usb:v1B75pA200d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in* Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
