On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 20:56 +0100, intrigeri wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > > Hi, > > Brian Drummond wrote (25 Oct 2014 12:32:42 GMT) : > > The "non serious data loss" may be a misnomer. It is my assessment > > because, if one assumes that a copy finished correctly when it actually > > terminated, the client machine is left with an incomplete data set. > > Indeed, in my book this doesn't qualify as RC => downgrading severity.
No problem. > (And: thanks for the detailed debugging!) I'm trying. Still haven't found a way to identify who owns the segfaulting "pool" process, but I haven't given up. Thanks, - Brian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
