On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:23:04AM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Hi Ross, > > I'm abroad at the moment so I don't have enough time to look at all the > questions in details - I will get back to it asap (or as soon as there > is no beer on the table, whichever is the first), but regarding > parameters definitions within each section - they can be redefined for > each section with no problem
This is just a wish, so there's no rush. As I said, some of the things I wish for (monitoring error.log) may not even be a good idea. The only thing that might be good to do sooner rather than later is a little warning about the path for apache2. > > As for log files for apache2 -- are you suggesting to create a separate > section for apache2 and have proper path setup? > *If* the failure patterns are different for Apache 2 then a separate section is in order. Otherwise, probably just a reminder to edit the path of the log file would suffice. A separate Apache 2 section has the possible advantage of being more obvious and idiot-proof, but maybe not much more. People could see the [apache] section and never notice there's an [apache2] below it. Ross -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
