On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Thorsten Glaser <t.gla...@tarent.de> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > >> I don't feel this as a so important bug to request a freeze exception. >> Do you think it is worth an unblock request? > > I’d like to ask the RT for it, if you agree with including it > if they give their okay, yes. Multi-Arch support is a Release > Goal, and chroot compatibility is not unimportant either. > > That is, if you have a look over the patch and don’t have any > thing against my solution for it. > >> I planned an upload with only the fix for the FTBFS in a couple of day. > > OK. (If you need a sponsor for that – I can do that today.) [...] >> You're right, I should add a Pre-Depends as you did. If you want you >> might commit+push this change to the repo. > > Okay, will do.
I'm using the jessie branch for this, given that I already merged 105 in the master branch. I'm ok, if you want to commit+push+tag+upload, I'll file un unblock request before evening. I think a team upload would be the best in this case. >> Maybe we can include this change to an upload targeting experimental, >> asking for pre-approval and once obtained upload to unstable? what do >> you think of this plan? > > Good idea, yes. I can do both uploads, if you want. >> My plan (with upstream ack) was to rewrite eatmydata.sh.in and >> eatmydata.in in a single eatmydata script, forward it to upstream, > > This is more or less what I did – except this solution will > probably(!) only work with GNU ld.so (I’d have to try BSD’s, > but Debian GNU/kFreeBSD uses GNU’s so no trouble there, and > I know it ignores Darwin). > > But I could extend the script to add back support for the > other ld.so types in the way upstream currently uses. Let me re-read it, please. I noted something I'd like to change, but I never thought about others linker, I'd like to understand better the implications. Will reply once I clear my doubts. Before night I'll tell you "something". > Sure. I would, of course, be willing to help and change the > script accordingly. (Being author of a shell has got to be > worth something, after all…) Great, thanks! I'm sure I'll use your help ;) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 4096R/B9444540 http://goo.gl/I8TMB more about me: http://mapreri.org Launchpad User: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri Ubuntu Wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MattiaRizzolo
signature.asc
Description: GooPG digital signature
