Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 07.12.05 Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> According to our analysis, the bug occurred because you kept >> woody's configuration files and refused the update to the sarge >> versions - in other words it is not a bug, and I'm closing it. >> > Correct me, if I'm wrong: IIRC the default answer for "Your config > file was changed by you or by a script: what do you want to do?" Is: > "keep the manually crafted config file" So this is not really a user > error, IMHO. That was one reason, why I had trouble during woody -> > sarge upgrade.
It's still the user's responsibility to check for problems with changed conffiles before reporting a bug. But you are right, Hilmar, a package should care for this, and tetex *does*. We have extra code in the postinst to force /var/lib/texmf into TEXMF. Strange that it didn't work for Robert. Robert, can you send us your /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf and /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf, ideally the versions before you fixed it? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
