On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Josh Triplett wrote: > I'd used "the Technical Committee considered" rather intentionally in > the wording I suggested, to avoid any of the controversy around "was > asked" from the previous last decision. Not going to push for that, > just pointing it out as intentional.
We really were asked, as the CTTE itself doesn't decide to consider something. I've tweaked the wording slightly. > While it's a bit of a nitpick, the transition plan involves more than > just the init package The groundwork for it was already there thanks to Steve's work; the transition plan was really just the init package. But since it doesn't hurt anything, modified. > I'd suggested clarifying that this applies to both upgraded systems > and new installs. Thoughts on that clarification? Sure; it seems obvious to me, but since it's what I mean, clarified. > Typo: s/swithc/switch/ Fixed, thanks. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com Who is thinking this? I am. -- Greg Egan _Diaspora_ p38 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org