2014-11-26 12:17 GMT+02:00 Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org>: > Anton Zinoviev <an...@lml.bas.bg> (2014-11-26): >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 05:45:56PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> > >> > and that… leads me to believe that nobody actually looked at what's in >> > git between 1.114 and 1.115; there's a single commit. >> > >> > Now, trying to rebuild 1.114 and 1.115 from the respective git tags, >> > using “debuild -S -i -I”, leads me to the following diff: >> > Keyboard/ckbcomp | 84 >> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > debian/changelog | 8 +++++ >> > 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+) >> > >> > which matches the changes in git. >> > >> > So it looks to me that both the 1.114 and 1.115 uploads were including >> > unwanted files/changes. See the following diffstats, between the >> > versions in the archive (fetched through debsnap) and my local builds: >> > >> > [...] >> > >> > I'm therefore tempted to upload 1.116 which would match 1.115 without >> > the cruft, also known as 1.114 plus the bugfix minus the cruft. >> > >> > Christian, Anton: please make sure to upload clean(er) packages next time. >> >> Except for the fontconfig directory in the source package, there are no >> other problems in 1.114 or 1.115. The differences between my upload and >> the upload of Christian are due to different versions of xkb-data we >> have used. > > Errr, see the diff between the source packages in the archive and the > ones actually built from the relevant git tags (the diffstats were > provided, which you replaced with [...]). They are very much filled with > cruft. > > Which makes it very hard for people to figure out what changed.
Are we anywhere close to a definitive fix on this one? -- Martin-Éric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist