Hi, Guido Günther wrote (20 Dec 2014 10:27:18 GMT) : > Following upstream's reasoning:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00950.html > I'm inclinded to tag this wontfix since we'd otherwise change > behaviour in regard to other distros. Agreed. > We could add a HaswellDebian2 in ase we want that featureset > codified as well. I don't think it's worth the hassle: users will need to take some manual action anyway, so they can as well switch to model=copyhost or whatever it's called. However, it's maybe worth adding a few lines about microcode updates vs. CPU features in README.Debian? (Ideally, the microcode package's NEWS.Debian would have done so, but now it's too late so the best place to clarify what's happening seems to be the libvirt package itself, no?) Cheers, -- intrigeri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org