Hi Steffen, 2014-12-22 10:22 GMT+01:00 "Steffen Möller" <steffen_moel...@gmx.de>:
> Much in support of Dylan, please also think about the binary filename of > the executable. We had the unfortunate p-link for Version 1 to avoid a > clash with one of the putty tools. This was a mistake at the time imho. > Shall we correct for that? Or is upstream already defaulting to plink2? > This would then give us p-link and plink2 as executables. Hurts. > The upstream devs always name the new binary "plink" but they recommend to rename it to "plink2" and the old plink to "plink1" to avoid the name conflict. So, I rename the binary plink2 for the new version and maybe we can also rename the first plink from "p-link" to "plink1" with a symbolic link to "p-link" to avoid problem for our users which already use the name "p-link". What do you think? Best regards, Dylan
