On 2015-01-14 20:39, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hey Niels, > > Niels Thykier [2015-01-14 19:26 +0100]: >> Ugh, that is indeed very bad. Please upload the fix for that to tpu at >> your earliest convenience. For reference, I have attached (what I >> believe was) the proposed debdiff to this bug (as it makes it easier for >> us to keep track of what was approved). > > Done.
Hi, Thanks, > I uploaded it as 3.6jessie1 instead of 3.6.1 to conform with the > developer reference. Okay. It seems like the developers reference is out of date. These days we prefer the use of +debXuY (or so). The problem with codenames is that they sort poorly (case in point being wheezy > jessie). Then again, I ought to have commented on that already when acking the original debdiff. > Was the missing upload the reason for "moreinfo", > or something else? > Nope, just the upload. It does not seem to have been accepted yet, so I am leaving the tag on. Please remove it once you get an accepted mail. >> I must admit that I am tempted to let autopkgtest consider it given the >> circumstances and the nature/purpose of the package. However, please do >> not wait with the tpu upload for such a decision. We are bit overbooked >> right now and it will not be my first priority. > > Ack, I guess this can still be considered after the tpu upload. > Indeed. :) > Thanks and sorry for the trouble! > > Martin > No worries. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
