/me wonders why a new bug was opened on this when #260141 is also still open...
On Monday 12 December 2005 18:23, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 07:10:35AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > (CC'ing -boot as this is strongly installer-related given that > > > exim4 is installed on all systems by default) > > > > I have tried for a week to get comments about this on #debian-boot, > > but nobody seems to care. Why should I? > > Hmm, I understand. I haven't seen much answer to your mail and I > missed the moment when you came on #debian-boot asking for advices so > I couldn't do my best to trigger a discussion. I do seem to remember talking about this on #d-boot at the time (either with Mark or Christian) and saying that changing the priority does seem consistent with other packages as the question does have a default that results in a working mailsystem where system mails are delivered in a sane way [1]. However, that is probably only a real option if: - preseeding the question (and other exim configuration questions) works - preseeding exim configuration is properly documented in the new appendix on preseeding in the installation guide Given the conversation on IRC today about preseeding exim questions, I guess a volunteer is needed to check this, especially as exim is installed a bit differently than in the past. [1] Of course, given the time that has passed since then, this may be an example of creative memory manipulation.
pgpK5eZoBQMqn.pgp
Description: PGP signature