Hi Michael,

> That means, depending on the timing, anacron-resume.service might be
> triggered just before suspend not on resume, and it's not guaranteed
> that anacron has finished before systemd-sleep is called.
> 
> I don't think the patch was intended this way?
thanks for the analysis. Is there are reason for not reopening the bug?

Patrick

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to