Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> writes: > On Tue, 03 Feb 2015, Richard Hartmann wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> wrote: >> > 1) name of the psuedopackage >> > >> > Presumably, that's "summit.debconf.org" in this case. >> >> Correct. >> >> > 2) a short description of what the pseudopackage will be used for >> > (suitable for inclusion in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages) >> >> Problems and requests related to the DebConf Summit instance > > OK. > >> > 3) The e-mail address of the maintainer of the psuedopackage >> >> Unsure; the general list may be too spammy, yet we would ideally want >> to avoid Yet Another Mailing List. Can we just add ourselves with >> personal addresses for now? >> >> Initially: >> cate@d.o >> e...@zhevny.com >> richih@d.o >> stefanor@d.o > > I'd really prefer not to; that would require me editing the maintainer > list manually any time someone wanted it changed. [And it also doesn't > scale very well; a mailing list also enables anyone who wants to join > your team without having to bug me.] > > I should note as well that whatever the mailing list is, it needs to be > configured to allow BTS mail. Currently debconf-team does not appear to > be properly configured.
I think the best would be to create a new list for this on lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian list infrastructure anyway. I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org. A list also makes it easier for other interested persons to join the team or just watch what's going on. debconf-team does not seem like the right list of this is also about implementation discussions and the like. Gaudenz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
