Ok, I probably read some other commit. This looks good. Thanks, Ondrej
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015, at 10:08, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 19:07:46 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2015, at 16:51, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > I think the other merged bug, already fixed in git should cover this > > > problem, by improving the documentation. Let me know if it does not. > > > > > > > > > <https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/commit/?id=9d70c7a6582b2d> > > > I still think you should explicitly mention the cases when switching > > from arch:all to arch:any or vice versa and what to do and what not. As > > I am not so well versed in dpkg internals the commit you mentioned > > doesn't make it very clear for me. > > This is the change: > > ,--- > +The package name. When the package is "Multi-Arch: same" this parameter > +must include the architecture qualifier, otherwise it should \fBnot\fP > +usually include the architecture qualifier (as it would disallow > +cross-grades, or switching from being architecture specific to > +architecture \fBall\fP or vice versa). > +If the parameter is empty or omitted, the \fBDPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_PACKAGE\fP > +and \fBDPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_ARCH\fP environment variables (as set by > \fBdpkg\fP) > +will be used to generate an arch-qualified package name. > `--- > > Here, I'm actually mentioning the arch:all ←→ arch:any case explicitly, > and it seems to be clear to me, so it would be helpful if you could point > out where the wording is not clear or what can be improved to make it so? > > Thanks, > Guillem -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
