at bottom :-
On 4/7/15, Michael Lustfield <mich...@lustfield.net> wrote:
> severity 779825 normal
> thanks
>
> The initial report here was about Nginx failing to install. We've now
> determined this is because the user disabled IPv6 support on their
> system. This isn't simply a non-standard case, it's a nonsensical one.
> Accommodating this use case would cause headaches for pretty much
> every single other person that uses Nginx.
>
> For those reasons, we won't be making any changes to accommodate this
> particular situation.
>
> It's worth noting that the decision to disable IPv6 support broke
> multiple other packages as well. This has nothing to do with Nginx.
>
>
> Additionally, there was mention of not failing an install/upgrade when
> the init script fails. I've looked into this and feel that would be a
> poor choice. I have managed to discover multiple cases where this can
> wreak havoc on large deployments. Failing an install or upgrade if the
> init script fails is the best option.
>
>
> Is there any reason to keep this open?
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send mail to 779825-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org.
Hi Michael,
feel free to close it.
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
