On Apr 12, 2015, at 6:10 AM, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-04-12 at 01:37 -0700, Rick Thomas wrote: >> Ben Hutchings indicates that his preference would be to disable the >> non-battery-backed RTC and enable the battery-backed RTC in the kernel >> for the Cubox-i4pro. >> >> I’m not a kernel hacker, so what I’m about to say may be off the mark, >> but: >> >> If I’m not mistaken, this kernel is intended to be used on the entire >> Cubox line of computers. Only the i4Pro model has the battery-backed >> RTC available. The other models do not enable that hardware feature. > [...] > > Are you saying that a single device tree is used for multiple models? > That should not be the case. > > But it looks like there are only two device trees defined for Cubox, one > for those with the i.MX6DL and one for the i.MX6Q. Both of which enable > both RTCs! > > So you're right, we can't just disable the non-battery-backed RTC for > this one model. Thanks for clarifying what I was trying to get at. Looking forward to help test this! > Ben. > > -- > Ben Hutchings > compatible: Gracefully accepts erroneous data from any source Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
